HEX
Server: LiteSpeed
System: Linux node612.namehero.net 4.18.0-553.121.1.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 30 16:40:41 UTC 2026 x86_64
User: dfwparty (1186)
PHP: 8.3.31
Disabled: NONE
Upload Files
File: //home/dfwparty/mail/.spam/new/1741085325.M758353P536946.node612.namehero.net,S=4210,W=4289
Return-Path: <mail@makeinlab.fr>
Delivered-To: dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net
Received: from node612.namehero.net
	by node612.namehero.net with LMTP
	id SASWLI3axmdyMQgAJLeZpw
	(envelope-from <mail@makeinlab.fr>)
	for <dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net>; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:48:45 -0700
Return-path: <mail@makeinlab.fr>
Envelope-to: mikedee@dfwfun.net
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:48:45 -0700
Received: from 89.213.144.63.as215142.net ([89.213.144.63]:49674 helo=mail.makeinlab.fr)
	by node612.namehero.net with esmtp (Exim 4.98.1)
	(envelope-from <mail@makeinlab.fr>)
	id 1tpPpK-00000002W04-2L7H
	for mikedee@dfwfun.net;
	Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:48:45 -0700
Received: from makeinlab.fr (unknown [213.209.150.151])
	by mail.makeinlab.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619A0D4D8B
	for <mikedee@dfwfun.net>; Tue,  4 Mar 2025 10:41:58 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: barristerpierresalao@gmail.com
From: mail@makeinlab.fr
To: mikedee@dfwfun.net
Date: 04 Mar 2025 01:41:48 -0800
Message-ID: <20250304014148.09B6DE2389F4DA6B@makeinlab.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.1
X-Spam-Score: 61
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "node612.namehero.net",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  l sent you a message a few days ago and I have been expecting
    to hear from you. Please confirm if you received my previous email. Yours
    Sincerely, Barrister Pierre Salao 
 Content analysis details:   (6.1 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an
                              open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [89.213.144.63 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [89.213.144.63 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [89.213.144.63 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                          [89.213.144.63 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP            Message was received from an IP address
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
  2.6 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS
  0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG  HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
  1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
                             anti-forgery methods
  1.8 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Please confirm

l sent you a message a few days ago and I have been expecting to hear from =
you. Please confirm if you received my previous email. Yours Sincerely, Bar=
rister Pierre Salao