Return-Path: <EltonF@un.org>
Delivered-To: dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net
Received: from node612.namehero.net
	by node612.namehero.net with LMTP
	id QCtiGcPEMGjncjoAJLeZpw
	(envelope-from <EltonF@un.org>)
	for <dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net>; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:56:03 -0600
Return-path: <EltonF@un.org>
Envelope-to: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Delivery-date: Fri, 23 May 2025 12:56:03 -0600
Received: from [185.93.89.220] (port=58270 helo=un.org)
	by node612.namehero.net with esmtp (Exim 4.98.1)
	(envelope-from <EltonF@un.org>)
	id 1uIXYg-0000000GEcI-2Eqc
	for glopez@gigiscleaning.net;
	Fri, 23 May 2025 12:56:03 -0600
Reply-To: lawcartel@otheremail.org
From: 'ELTON ASSOCIATES'<EltonF@un.org>
To: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Date: 23 May 2025 11:55:19 -0700
Message-ID: <20250523115519.D5668804744D0F4A@un.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.8
X-Spam-Score: 148
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "node612.namehero.net",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Dear glopez@gigiscleaning.net, UNCLAIMED ESTATE Greetings
   to you and your family.My late client passed away intestate, meaning without
    a will.Once the prescribed amount of time has passed, the deceased person's
    assets will be considered bona vacant [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (14.8 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an
                              open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [185.93.89.220 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?185.93.89.220>]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [185.93.89.220 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [185.93.89.220 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URI: family.my]
  0.0 URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             dbl.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an
                              open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [URI: family.my]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                          [185.93.89.220 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  4.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=eltonf%40un.org;ip=185.93.89.220;r=node612.namehero.net]
  4.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL          SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=un.org;ip=185.93.89.220;r=node612.namehero.net]
  1.5 KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE   DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message
                              and the domain has a DMARC quarantine policy
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.0 FROM_MISSP_REPLYTO     From misspaced, has Reply-To
  0.0 FROM_MISSP_SPF_FAIL    No description available.
  1.5 ADVANCE_FEE_3_NEW      Appears to be advance fee fraud (Nigerian 419)
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  UNCLAIMED ESTATE!!!!!!

Dear glopez@gigiscleaning.net,
                     UNCLAIMED ESTATE

Greetings to you and your family.My late client passed away
intestate, meaning without a will.Once the prescribed amount of
time has passed, the deceased person's assets will be considered
bona vacantia, or ownerless.

You and my late client share the same last name, which is why I'm
reaching out to you.

I would like to know whether you are related so that your
entitlement can be processed and paid to you..

Warm regards,
Elton Fabian