Return-Path: <DRSYD08120@msn.com>
Delivered-To: dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net
Received: from node612.namehero.net
	by node612.namehero.net with LMTP
	id /u5WG1OqMmqdMB4AJLeZpw
	(envelope-from <DRSYD08120@msn.com>)
	for <dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net>; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:08:19 -0600
Return-path: <DRSYD08120@msn.com>
Envelope-to: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:08:19 -0600
Received: from [82.165.243.3] (port=61110)
	by node612.namehero.net with esmtp (Exim 4.99.4)
	(envelope-from <DRSYD08120@msn.com>)
	id 1wZqwC-00000008Gsg-0aVS
	for glopez@gigiscleaning.net;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:08:19 -0600
Reply-To: sginfo100@gmail.com
From: Dr. Seyed <DRSYD08120@msn.com>
To: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Date: 17 Jun 2026 14:07:38 +0000
Message-ID: <20260617140738.17EBF46849383560@msn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.8
X-Spam-Score: 178
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "node612.namehero.net",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Hello, I would like to discuss a potential business with you.
    Please feel free to reply to me at your convenience for more discussion. 
 Content analysis details:   (17.8 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an
                              open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [82.165.243.3 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
                [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?82.165.243.3>]
  1.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL   RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
                         [82.165.243.3 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [82.165.243.3 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  6.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5      RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
                             [82.165.243.3 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
  1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blocklisted
  0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE         DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and
                             the domain has no DMARC policy
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             [drsyd08120(at)msn.com]
  1.0 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
                             digit
                             [drsyd08120(at)msn.com]
  0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
                             [sginfo100(at)gmail.com]
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.7 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS From SPOOFED_FREEMAIL and no rDNS
  1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO       Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
                             freemails
  0.7 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL       No description available.
  1.4 SPOOFED_FREEM_REPTO    Forged freemail sender with freemail reply-to
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Greetings,

Hello,

I would like to discuss a potential business with you.

Please feel free to reply to me at your convenience for more=20
discussion.

I await your response.

Best regards,
Dr. Seyed